Photo by: MotoPhoto

Blue sub-photo line.GIF (62 bytes)






 

 

PRAISE FOR
Though the Heavens May Fall
The Landmark Trial that Led to the End of Human Slavery

Marilynne Robinson - The New York Times
Wise, the president of the Center for the Expansion of Fundamental Rights, traces with reverent care how the question of the legality of slavery developed within England, culminating in this famous trial.

 

Library Journal
Legal historian Wise examines how 18th-century English abolitionists created legal arguments to challenge slavery. Granville Sharp was a leading abolitionist whose legal failures and eventual success are analyzed here in the context of 18th-century English law and common-law precedents. Wise emphasizes two cases, Lewis v. Stapylton (1771) and the trial of James Somerset (1772). In the latter case, Wise examines Lord Chief Justice Mansfield's legal course to declaring slavery in England as immoral and illegal since it was wrong to treat human beings as property. Wise shows how Mansfield could interpret common law to meet the changing needs of society. Wise uses historical analysis to draw connections between these cases and later U.S. activities concerning freedom in the American Revolution and Civil War. This thoughtful analysis provides an underpinning for the social and legal context of slavery, making this a recommended book for academic and larger public libraries.
-- Steven Puro, St. Louis Univ.
Copyright 2005 Reed Business Information

 

Blue line.GIF (62 bytes)

PRAISE FOR
Drawing the Line

Nature
Provocative and disturbing...compelling and cogent...An important book.

Salon.com
Wise's accounts of animals' mental abilities are fascinating and thought-provoking.

Wilson Quarterly
[Wise has] the skill and seriousness the subject deserves.

San Diego Union Tribune
People should read this book... scientists,anybody who owns an animal,anybody who cares about the future of biological research.

 

Blue line.GIF (62 bytes)

PRAISE FOR
Rattling the Cage
Toward Legal Rights for Animals

From January Magazine, May 17, 2000
Imagine a four-year-old taken from his family, locked in a cage, subjected to medical experiments and killed. His tormentors receive not prison sentences but professional accolades and large grants. Steven Wise asks why we've allowed this to happen. For complete review click here.

The New York Times Book Review
This is an impassioned, fascinating and in many ways startling book.
-- Cass R. Sunstein

Publishers Weekly
"In a groundbreaking study, Harvard lecturer Wise argues that chimpanzees and bonobos (sometimes called "pygmy chimpanzees") should be granted the status of legal personhood to guarantee the basic protections of bodily integrity and freedom from harm.... Documenting the treatment of our close primate cousins, which are routinely kidnapped for biomedical research, slaughtered for their meat and caged in roadside zoos, Wise notes that chimpanzees and bonobos are nearing annihilation....This impassioned, closely argued brief presents a formidable challenge to the treatment of animals perpetrated by agribusiness, scientific research, the pharmaceutical industry, hunters, live-animal traders and others. It's a clarion call for rethinking the animal-human relationship."

From Booklist January 1, 2000
Nonhuman animals are not "persons" in the legal sense and therefore have no legal rights. Wise, an animal rights activist and lawyer, argues for the entitlement of animals to legal rights in this scholarly new book. The author defines exactly what is meant by legal personhood through an overview of cases involving humans and demonstrates how this definition can be applied to animals, specifically chimpanzees and bonobos. The book's title is somewhat misleading, as the vast majority of the author's arguments refer to these two great apes, our closest relatives. The parallels drawn between legal arguments for human rights and research showing that apes demonstrate the same mental capacities as the human persons make for a compelling argument against the injustice of denying basic legal rights to apes. The text is extensively footnoted with quotes from a vast body of literature, legal and otherwise. Whether or not readers are convinced by Wise's arguments, they will find much to think about in this carefully reasoned and well-written book.
-- Nancy Bent

From Kirkus Reviews
A potentially historic work on the legal case for animal rights that shoots itself in the paw with shrill terms and tactics. Wise, who teaches animal-rights law at Harvard Law School and elsewhere, is a prominent legal defender and activist for animals. His specialty is the highly intelligent and endangered chimpanzee species favored by biomedical researchers, zookeepers, and African chefs. Wise takes us to academic facilities where scientists convincingly demonstrate the chimp's ability to understand cause and effect, use tools, and even perform basic mathematical calculations. The evidence is clear that these mistreated creatures are more ``human'' than young or brain-damaged Homo sapiens. Their neurology and genetic structure warrant reclassifying them within the genus Homo. Therefore, argues Wise, chimpanzees deserve at least the same legal rights and protections awarded to children and other people unable to speak for themselves. Unfortunately, Wise switches at this point from cogent attorney and law professor to agitated activist and polemicist. He not only demands legal ``personhood'' for his simian clients, but often refers to their destruction as ``genocide.'' Reviewing the history of law and religion, he blames their insistence on the sanctity of human life for ``the legal thinghood of nonhuman animals.'' Wise celebrates 19th-century atheism and scientism which, he believes, proved ``that the universe was not designed at all, much less designed for humans.'' In his narrow metal cage of a worldview, anyone who believes that evolution was divinely directed, that beings who understand ethics (not just basic syntax) may be supreme, or that some humans feel biblically forbidden even from yoking two unequal beasts together (in the name of divine animal rights) is a worse enemy of animals than the enlightened scientists who routinely torture and maim them for knowledge and profit. Radical monkeyshines ruin this well-intentioned treatise.
-- Copyright ©2000, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved.


 

Copyright and Disclaimer © 1998-2008 Literati.net