| |

Politics
MIRABELLA July 1998
KING OF
HEARTS
Former White
House reporter Nina Burleigh thought she was beyond being seduced by a man’s
power, his status, his job. Then she played cards
with the President on Air Force One.
For several years, I was
tethered to Bill Clinton on pool duty, in which reporters from national
magazines and newspapers take turns traveling with the president. I had
done it so often, Air Force One almost bored me, with all that windy waiting
on the tarmac, Clinton’s practiced wave on the steps, the Secret Service men
shoving and glaring at us through their mirrored lenses.
Pool journalists get closer
to the President than most people but rarely closer than fifteen yards
before being restrained by armed agents. Unless Clinton decides to wander
back in the plane to talk to one of us, we need a telephoto lens to read his
expression.
On one of these trips last
year, I found myself in the plane’s front cabin with only senior White House
advisor Bruce Lindsey and a deck of cards between me and the President. On
that flight from Chicago to Jasper, Arkansas, where the President was
stopping for a funeral, they needed a fourth for hearts. I volunteered.
Before we were at cruising altitude, I was sitting across from Clinton,
trying to concentrate on the cards, watching his hands shuffling the deck.
His white shirt cuffs were starch stiff, his cufflinks glinted gold. He
kept score-with a gold pen on a white notepad with an embossed golden-eagle
Presidential seal.
I knew all about the
President’s alleged attractiveness. His “zipper problem” had provided hours
of dinner-party amusement for my friends and me. Although I was one of the
people in Washington who didn’t believe Hillary Clinton stayed married for
the power alone, I had always seen the President’s charms only in a
theoretical way. I had interviewed some of the women who were accusing him
of sexual misbehavior. I talked to Gennifer Flowers in 1992. Later, I met
with Paula Jones at a Capitol Hill townhouse. Both women were
believable-although in Jones’s case, I suspect she had been more willing
than she was willing to let on.
Sex was not on my mind when
I sat down across from the President. I was more worried that I had
forgotten how to play hearts. He looked older in the flesh than from afar
or on TV. He had crow’s-feet and creepy skin. He seemed lonely, as if the
adulation of crowds and aides had given him a craving for more of the same.
I felt perversely sorry for the most powerful man in the world. Maybe that
explains his allure: We women love a lonely man.
I hadn’t expected to be so
near Clinton that summer day. I was dressed for hot, humid Washington. My
hair had been whipped into knots while waiting on the tarmac and was
restrained in messy braids. I was wearing a short, green Betsey Johnson
seer sucker suit, sandals, and no stockings-probably just the kind of outfit
Clinton’s former deputy chief of staff, Evelyn Lieberman, would have sent an
intern home to change out of lickety-split. My knees were scarred from a
recent bike wreck. Bare legs still offend Washington propriety, and I now
understand why: You never know when you’ll need to protect your modesty, and
perhaps your chastity, around a powerful man.
To my left at the card
table was Clinton’s boon companion, Bruce Lindsey, in his dark suit.
Lindsey is a taut, wired man with the density of lead. His silent
communication with the President was unsettling. Everything Lindsey uttered
seemed suggestive. “Bet you’ve never been to Jasper, Arkansas, before,” he
said to me with a sly grin at the President. They laughed. I wondered what
they’d gotten up to together in Jasper.
For an hour or so, we only
spoke about the game. I made a valiant effort to seem deadly serious – the
professional woman’s automatic defense against encroaching sexiness. In a
White House photograph of the scene, I could be conducting an interview
about the federal budget. Clinton didn’t say much, but I tried to preserve
his few remarks for posterity. The only comment worth remembering was that
Hillary doesn’t like the game of hearts. “She says she doesn’t get a game
where you lose by winning points,” he said.
Of course, nothing
happened. The President’s foot lightly, and presumably accidentally,
brushed mine once under the table. His hand touched my wrist while he was
dealing the cards. When I got up and shook his hand at the end of the game,
his eyes wandered over my bike-wrecked, naked legs. And slowly it dawned on
me as I walked away: He found me attractive.
No doubt the President’s
lawyers and spin doctors would say I wishfully imagined that long,
appreciative look, just as all those other women have fantasized their more
explicitly sexual encounters with Clinton. But we all know when we’re being
ogled. The weird thing was that I didn’t mind. There was a time when the
hormones of indignant feminism raged in my veins. An open gaze like that,
at least from a man of lesser stature, would have annoyed me. But that
evening, I had the opposite reaction. I felt incandescent. It was riveting
to know that the President had appreciated my legs, scarred as they were.
If he had asked me to continue the game of hearts back in his room at the
Jasper Holiday Inn, I would have been happy to go there and see what
happened. At the time, it seemed quite possible. It took several hours and
a few drinks in the steaming and now somehow romantic Arkansas night to
shake the intoxicated state in which I had been quite willing to let myself
be ravished by the President, should he have but asked. I probably wore the
mesmerized look I have seen again and again in women after they have met
him. The same silly hypnotized gleam was displayed on the cover of Time
magazine in Monica Lewinsky’s eyes.
I like to think I have
rejected the old customs and mores. Masters of the Universe don’t do it for
me. The richer and more famous they are, the less appealing. Donald
Trump? Ugh. John F. Kennedy, Jr.? A knockout, but imagine the
maintenance. Not that I prefer lumberjacks and day laborers, but men who
run Big Things and attract a lot of attention are a full-time job for their
mates. And we have all seen powerful men apply the callousness that gets
them through the day to their private lives. Give me a sexy, funny man who
finds me as interesting as the Dow Jones or his office politics, and I’m
happy. I like the statisticians who report that the strongest marriages are
couples where the woman has some status-equalizing attribute, such as age or
more education. That makes sense to me. The happiest I’ve ever been is
with the man I’m going to marry, a younger man whose charm, looks, and wit
are considerable, but who no interest in being a CEO.
And yet there I was,
walking away from a close encounter with the President of the United States,
stupefied and vaguely hoping that he’d sent an aide over to my hotel room to
ask me up for a drink. What is it in some of us, that powerful men make us
pliant and willing with a mere glance?
In Greek mythology, Zeus so
lusted after a mortal woman that he took the form of a swan and flew down
from Mount Olympus to have his way with her. William Butler Yeats’s poem
“Leda and the Swan” celebrated the scene with erotic imagery. “A sudden
blow: the great wings beating still /Above the staggering girl, her thighs
caressed /By the dark webs . . .”
Yeats was warned by his
editor that this poem might cause conservative readers to “misunderstand”
it. The poem is hardly ambiguous. Yeats honored the magnetic sexual pull a
powerful male can have on a weaker female. The beating wings of the giant
swan enwrap the helplessly infatuated woman, whose “terrified vague fingers”
cannot push the “feathered glory from her loosening thighs.”
I hated that poem as a
college student. I thought Yeats’s imagery celebrated a rape. Fifteen
years later, I reluctantly acknowledge the wild, unexpected attraction that
“important” men have for women, even for a feminist like me.
I have thought about my
mothlike encounter with Clinton in the months since Monica Lewinsky became
world famous. Distracting a powerful man from his business is one of the
highest forms of flattery available to women. Vanity makes us weak. To
feed it makes us feel strong. To be so distracting that a great man’s
career is on the line, even if you are despised afterward, is a tremendous
show of power, when – still – too few women can acquire power any other
way. The last lines of Yeats’s poem suggest a kind of reward for the woman
who submits. “Being so caught up, / So mastered by the brute blood of the
air, / Did she put on his knowledge with his power / Before the indifferent
beak could let her drop?”
I still cling to the faith
that there are women of good order who are immune to this stuff. They
were sensible clothes and keep their legs well covered. I trust that
Janet Reno, Donna Shalala, and Madeleine Albright are not rendered willing
and pliant around Bill Clinton. They don’t need to put on his
knowledge with his power when they have their own. For the rest of us,
a powerful man’s admiring gaze is an intimation of all that is inaccessible,
and that is the ultimate seduction.

Nina Burleigh responds to Atlantic's Yglesias
In re: your recent posting,
I just noticed you used a single sentence out of my 1997 Mirabella Clinton piece and the quote to Howie Kurtz welded together out of context in support of the idea that the 1990s were "Crazy Years." I am sorry I didn't see it back when you wrote it, because I would have responded within the thread, which is now closed, effectively allowing you to slag me on the web without any response.
While I agree those years were "crazy" the current decade is hardly any less insane, with actual dead bodies piling up by the tens of thousands thanks to current White House occupants.
Some of your commenters seemed to think you got my sense of humor, I can tell you did not. Maybe I can simplify it for you.
It was crazy that we actually had a special prosecutor investigating a president for having sex, diverting the entire govenrnment while there were other things to do, like look out for suicide bombers or figure out how to insure the uninsured.
It certainly was crazy for the nation to listen to beltway farts with comb-overs like Buchanan, Fred Barnes, Tim Russert, and yes, Lieberman, et al, piously debate "sexual harassment" while not a single woman from the DC establishment had the guts to get up and talk about sexual harassment experienced by women who worked alongside the old Capitol goats. Or to observe that flashing a thong at the boss wasn't standard victim behavior.
Was it possible that the American people watched that whole show without falling on the floor laughing? Amazingly, yes. Was it crazy for me to try to burst that fake little Puritanical bubble constructed by the right wing and the DC establishment together?
I also note that you apparently think a magazine called Mirabella was another element of those "crazy" years , i.e., a silly chick mag. Not, in other words, "The Atlantic." (Say that in a very low pitch of voice for desired effect, you smug pedigreed shmuck.) I can't wait to read your next book, it sounds absolutely gripping.
Cheers
Nina

MIRABELLA March
1999/Iraq
LAST FALL, NINA
BURLEIGH VISITED HER COUSINS IN BAGHDAD FOR THE FIRST TIME, IN HOPES OF BETTER UNDERSTANDING IRAQIS’ LOVE-HATE RELATIONSHIP WITH
AMERICA. BUT WEEKS LATER, AS THE BOMBS BEGAN TO
DROP, HER OWN LOYALTIES WENT TO WAR
My first night in the
Middle East, I feel as if I’m falling asleep on the dark side of the moon. There is a smoky kerosene smell and a mullah
calling “Allah akbar” (God is great) from the neon green rim of a minaret.
My flesh will take days to arrive in this time zone.
It’s three in the morning
and I’m in Jordan, in a one star hotel called the Cleopatra, a warren of rooms up three flights of narrow marble steps. A
pink worm is writhing on the bathroom floor, and the night clerk has just
called to ask if I need a massage. The Cleopatra is next to the Amman bus
depot, a way station for Third World travelers with little money and often
nothing left to sell but themselves. In the hotel lobby the next morning, I
meet an Iraqi woman named Salamiya. Her hair is bleached to a brassy nest
and she wears a tight sheath and green nail polish, her chubby feet stuffed
into stilettos.
She was sold by her
parents to a Saudi man for $5,000 a few years ago. She works at the
nightclubs now. She wants to get back into Iraq.
So do I. Iraq is the
enemy of my country and the country of my mother. I’m a half-breed, as Cher
used to wail back in the 70’s. My parents are a blue-eyed man with an
Anglo-Saxon name and a black-haired woman with a foreign accent. Usually
this mixed pedigree goes unnoticed, but in Louisiana, reporting on David
Duke a few years ago, I stopped at a country gas station to ask directions
to one of his rallies. “Why do you want to go there?” one of the guys
behind the counter asked in friendly wonderment. “You look like a sand
niggah to me.”
Since the Gulf War, I’ve
made three trips to Iraq, all of them as a journalist because that’s one of the few legal ways to get into the country.
Before I leave for my latest visit, in
mid-September, I meet with a representative of UNSCOM, the weapons
inspectors who have been trying to locate Iraq’s nerve gas, anthrax, and
botulism. The UNSCOM man explains that Saddam Hussein has been hiding his
weapons in a complicated shell game, and since the inspectors were about to
uncover his stash, he shut the whole operation down. (The next time Saddam
failed to provide access to weapons sites, he precipitated the pre-
Christmas bombing raid by the United States and Great Britain.)
I also speak with
acting UN ambassador A. Peter Burleigh (no relation, though he does resemble
an uncanny resemblance to my father). Burleigh admits the sanctions are
imperfect and that many countries within the UN oppose them, but the United
States opposes any easing without Saddam’s relenting on the weapons front.
I leave for Iraq with
the same set of conflicting emotions I packed with me on previous trips. I
am repelled by the Iraqi government, but I am not convinced that the people
should be made to suffer for the policies of a leader they didn’t even
elect. The Baath Party seized power in 1968 after a series of bloody coups
(by coincidence, I was an eight-year-old girl visiting my grandmother in
Iraq at the time), and Saddam took over in 1979. While the regime
nationalized oil, and the dedicated some of the proceeds to improving
education and the infrastructure, it has been notoriously brutal in
repressing dissent. Since the Gulf War, I have read the news of waxing and
waning crises over Baghdad with profound sorrow as well as frustration. By
virtue of my bloodline, I feel I must know something I should try to
communicate to other Americans. I’ve felt restricted by the rules of my job
as an unsentimental skeptic; by the war propaganda of the United States; by
the limits the Iraqi government puts on journalists; and, most of all, by
the Iraqi people’s fear of speaking openly.
On this trip, I decide to
visit my own relatives in hopes of unlocking some
door to understanding.
The only way to get
to Baghdad in sanctions-era Iraq is to rent a car or truck in Amman and
drive. For fifteen hours there is only treeless dirt, a crust of earth
floating on an ocean of oil. There is so much oil under Iraq that at prewar
pumping rates, it won’t run out until well into the third millennium.
As an American
entering totalitarian Iraq, each border crossing has provoked in me a
counterintuitive surge of personal liberation and power. Flipping my
passport onto the greasy desk of a condescending bureaucrat reminds me that
I’m in fact “Burleigh,” born in the land of the free and—in Iraq if not
always at home—a fully accredited member of the victorious nation. By an
accident of birth I’m not subject to Saddam Hussein’s regime, represented by
the Baath Party’s green star, stenciled on everything that doesn’t already
have Saddam’s portrait on it.
I share the car with
members of a group called Voices in the Wilderness, Americans who risk prison and fines to enter Iraq in defiance of a
U.S. State Department travel ban. They visit hospitals to deliver toys and
small amounts of medicine—and photograph malnourished children to illustrate
the effects of eight years of sanctions.
People in Iraq are
suffering. The UN concedes that five thousand children per month are
starving to death, and the professional class has been destroyed by the
collapse of the currency. But weird rumors abound in this isolated country
where information is controlled by the government, and Voices in the
Wilderness members are too willing to believe them. My fellow travelers
insist that uranium shells used in the war have caused leukemia and birth
defects—possible, but there are no medical studies to confirm that. They
also pass around demonstrably false tales: Schoolchildren’s pencils are
banned under the UN sanctions as a “dual use” item, meaning they can be used
as weapons; ditto for chlorine, essential for purifying water; a killer worm
dropped on Iraq by the U.S. is eating children’s brains. I see pencils;
UNICEF officials say chlorine is available; and, as for the killer worms. .
.
Two of the four Voices
representatives have never been out of the United States before and began fasting to protest the sanctions a month before the
trip. One, a pallid college student who carries a backpack decorated with
antinuke buttons, will later almost pass out while visiting a hospital, overcome by
hunger, heat, and the sight of infants with deformities that the Iraqis
blame on the Gulf War. He and the others are compassionate, but their
refusal to acknowledge anything but American violence seems terribly naïve.
Were they Iraqis and the situation reversed, they wouldn’t make it to the
border of their own country without being shot. Dissent here is punishable
by death.
Green specks of
vegetation mark the approach to the oasis that is Baghdad. Near the city,
the heat increases exponentially; the air outside feels like the inside of a
pizza oven. Built by the caliphs on the Tigris River 1,200 years ago.
Baghdad is bathed in yellow twilight, the color of evening in Iraq. Neon
signs and pedestrians and date trees are ghostly in the gathering dusk.
The hotel where we stay
overlooks the date-tree-lined banks of the Tigris River. After dark, packs
of wild dogs, the offspring of pets nobody could feed, emerge from the
riverbank and hunt. Disco music blares from the high-rise hotel across the
street. The same tape with Cyndi Lauper, Tina Turner, and the Eagles
replays until three A.M.
Iraq is saturated with our
culture. The state television broadcasts bootleg videos while films are
still in American theaters, so Iraqi children have all seen Titanic and
Godzilla; rich kids even have Leo DiCaprio T-shirts. For adults, the United
States provides another sort of entertainment. One night I find a group of
men gathered around the TV in the hotel lobby, watching President Clinton, I
stand a minute in the smoke of their cheap cigarettes before realizing they’re watching his
just-released grand jury testimony—already dubbed into Arabic.
At the Iraqi Women’s
Federation, a bureaucracy of Saddam’s cheerleaders, as it were (where I go on a failed mission to try to confirm reports that
growing numbers of Iraqi women are turning to prostitution), the front door
is decorated with “Down with America,” in Arabic. But during one of my
visits, the secretaries and clerks, shy women dressed for some reason in
party clothes (one even wears a rhinestone tiara), crowd into the room to
share celebrity gossip and ask about current fashions. I only realize how
truly isolated they are when one asks whether Princess Caroline of Monaco
has her hair back.
Iraqi’s widespread
awareness of Western culture and internal American politics makes their submission to Saddam’s regime that much more puzzling.
How can they not fight for freedoms they know exist elsewhere? What would
it take to make these people rise up?
Iraqi is full of people who
will look you in the eye and tell you what a great
guy Saddam is. Some of them appear to mean it, too. They’re the ones
who’ve benefited from his long rule and continue to receive
rewards—including the right to associate with Westerners and, if they can
find one who needs some help, get paid in American dollars.
My third day in Iraq, I
hire a translator through the Information Ministry. Mariam comes from a
prominent family, so prominent she refuses to give her last name—aristocrats
aren’t supposed to have to work for a living. Over tea, her blue eyes fill
with tears as she ticks off Saddam’s acts of kindness. He sent her a Patek
Philippe watch after she wrote a story he liked, and later he sent her
several large screen TVs. “Americans do not understand how generous he is,”
she says. “He used to walk in the streets and talk to the people. His
phone number was in the book; anyone could call him. He paid for surgery
for the poor! He bought people houses! He was so generous.” She shakes
her head. “And now he must hide because the Americans want to kill him.”
She refers only obliquely
to the terror under which Iraqis live. She tells me that to associate with
Iraqis on my own could get them into trouble. That may be true in some
circumstances, but I suspect that the warning is
most frequently issued by people like Mariam, who wish to earn hard currency
from frightened Westerners.
My visits to my
cousins’ house, on a middle-class Baghdad street a few miles from UN
headquarters, are inchoate affairs. I can’t speak their language and they
barely speak mine. The family—my mother’s cousin, partially paralyzed by a
stroke, and his wife; their son, who’s ten years younger than I but looks
ten years older, his wife and three young daughters—aren’t starving. But
none of them have jobs. They’re supported by a brother in Sweden who’s a
doctor. They’re not the kind of Iraqis who get gifts from the president.
As I sit in the quiet of
their walled garden, they bring out glasses of an orange drink on a tray and
show me old family photos. I am transfixed by a picture of the grandfather
who died before I was born, receiving a handshake and a gift from a ruddy
British corporate type for his lifetime of service to the Iraq Petroleum
Company. I.P.C. was the multinational that pumped and profited from Iraq’s
oil until it was nationalized. My grandfather looks thin and shy, a clerk
unused to attention.
Because of the money sent
by the brother in Sweden, the food on the table is plentiful—chicken,
stuffed vegetables, rice— all served by my second cousin’s plump young wife,
who refuses to eat with us in the time-honored tradition of women in Iraq.
(I am the esteemed guest and eat first, like a man and with the men.) She
is not yet twenty-five, and her submission to her husband and my aunt and
uncle is unwavering. I watch for signs of rebellion, but her mien never
cracks.
In their spartan
living room with Assyrian Christian symbols on the walls, I think of my
mother’s fractured life, an d her sudden flight as a college girl in the mid
1950’s to Norfolk, Virginia, where she lived with members of a church
group. Though my mother was never involved in political activity, her
parents sent her away for fear she would be rounded up with other
intellectuals during a coup taking place at the time. She has coped by not
looking back, and consequently, my siblings and I never learned the language
or the customs of her country.
As I strain to communicate
with my relatives, I worry I might be violating some taboo. Childless,
unmarried, traveling alone, I’m not male or female but an androgyne from
another planet. I wish I had brought pictures of my boyfriend. I’m a mere
generation away from that man who worked his whole life for the oil company,
but now I’m of another race, the one privileged with information and access
and money. I’m suddenly homesick.
When I leave my cousins’, a
man in black is standing outside watching. The Iraqi secret police, the
mukhabarat, are the regime’s eyes and ears. As much as I might wish the
Iraqis would revolt, I, too, am frozen with fear at the sight of this
watcher in the yellow twilight.
My last night in Baghdad, I
bring my relatives’ children the only soft toys I can find without noise
boxes squawking English inside. The gifts are stuffed Mickey Mouses—American
talismans I half-imagine them clutching in future bombings. As I leave, I
ask my cousin what he plans to do. He shrugs with a fatalistic air, then
echoes what a
hotel clerk told me: “We have no future.”
I am no more able to
explain Iraqis now than I was before. Their submission to Saddam and
simultaneous veneration of America is something I’d rather not understand,
like death. We look away from the lost because we cannot go with them.
When my cousin asked whether I thought there would be more bombing, I told
him yes. His response was impassive, like his wife’s submission, and I saw
my own inconsequentiality mirrored in him.
On December 16, I watch
CNN’s eerie green footage of Baghdad at night, waiting for the bombs to
fall. In my mind’s eye, I see my cousin making preparations, hiding his
daughters and his paralyzed father under their beds.
Then I turn off the
TV and go to a Christmas party.

America, Beacon of Hope?
Once It Was
Published 11/10/03 at History News
Network
A few weeks ago, President
George W. Bush went before the UN, asking for money for the United States
from the global community. It remains to be seen whether anyone will come to
our aid, but it's easy to imagine the eye-rolling in Europe and especially
in third world countries, at the sight of the swaggering superpower asking
alms.
The fact that our
president has to hold out the hat before a chilly, unfriendly audience of
global diplomats shows just how much America as an idea has changed. Not so
long ago, the nation was an idea that embodied the best hopes and dreams of
Europeans. The power of this idea was so strong in the early nineteenth
century that an English scientist who was a complete stranger to our shores
-- who had never set foot here and who knew Americans only as they were
caricatured in the British press (that is, rail-splitting provincials ) --
gave his entire fortune to the United States to found at Washington an
institution "for the increase and diffusion of knowledge among men."
In the two years
since the day of the weapon-ized jets and crumbling towers, many Americans
have grown leery of traveling to Washington D.C. Those who still visit
stroll the green swath between the Washington Monument and the U.S. Capitol
building and pass the ubiquitous signs bearing the name "Smithsonian." If
they investigate further, they find that even today, entry to each and every
one of the Smithsonian museums is absolutely free.
The national mall is
today a living memorial to a man tourists must assume played a prominent
role in the founding of our nation. On the contrary, James Smithson, a minor
eighteenth century scientist and bastard son of the British nobility whose
half million dollars in 1836 money founded the nation's foremost cultural
repository, had never seen the country nor probably met many Americans at
all. His experience of America was entirely intellectual.
Living today, with
"U.S.A." a synonym for global supremacy in military power, we and the
Europeans tend to forget that eighteenth century Europeans -- from wealthy
intellectuals like Smithson to the poor and tyrannized masses -- had a
vision for the new nation forming across the water. Whether they huddled in
seasick droves to get here, or merely thought and read about America, as did
Smithson, the distant, still-savage land represented not brute power, but
the promise of a better human condition.
Smithson and his
peers believed this vast wild land would spawn a new Athens, with a thriving
culture built on freedom of thought. They certainly had no inkling that
America would someday be symbolized by fighter bombers or the bullying power
of its leaders to force an issue like the invasion of Iraq. Rather, they
imagined a place where art, literature, and - for Smithson especially -
science would thrive and flourish under a national government that had
codified individual opportunity in an officially classless society.
Then, as now, there
were American politicians who thought it "beneath our dignity" to take money
from a European, and who feared that to spend money on cultural institutions
would dangerously expand the power of the federal government. It took a
decade for the money to be accepted and put to use to seed the Smithsonian
museum complex on the national mall today.
The optimistic spirit
of scientific inquiry for the public good that motivated Smithson's bequest
was a trend that developed in England during his lifetime. In 1800, Smithson
joined with a group of British scientists and reformers -- including the
poet William Blake -- to found the Royal Institution, an organization
specifically created to diffuse scientific knowledge among the public
through a series of lectures.
When Smithson
bequeathed his money to the United States, the nation was hardly an emblem
of Enlightenment. The trade in human flesh was thriving and shackled blacks
could be seen from Capitol Hill, being bought and sold near the banks of the
Potomac. The cultural pastimes of Washington D.C. consisted mainly of
tobacco-chewing and duelling.
In spite of that,
Smithson believed that the diffusion of knowledge among those less likely to
attain it could be implemented in the United States, and that that diffusion
would bring about a better world. In just a few hundred years, he was proved
right. Since Smithson's death, the world has changed beyond the imagination
of eighteenth century Europeans, with many of the changes initiated by
American scientific men who were not to the manor born.
Living on the cusp
between two centuries, Smithson the scientist discerned that the world was
on the verge of the vast transformations we now know occurred, but he could
not have envisioned the speed, human longevity and global communications
that we take for granted. All Smithson had, really, was faith that great and
positive changes could emanate from America.
Residing in France
for the last few years, I was often confronted with the scornful image that
modern Europeans hold of Americans. The cliché is familiar to us all: fat,
SUV-driving, culturally backward, anti-intellectual, swaggering,
armed-to-the-teeth boors. I see their point, but for all our flaws, we must
never let the Europeans - or ourselves - forget that this country did live
up to the greatest aspirations of the European forebears. Yes, our popular
culture has flooded the world with Britney and bad television, and our
scientists have developed monstrosities from the Humvee to the atomic bomb.
This same national culture has produced people whose inventions -- cars,
airplanes, telephones, light bulbs, and the Internet, to name just a few --
have utterly and forever changed life on earth for the better.
In these post 9-11
times, we have all been trying to understand -- or deny -- the hatred
directed at our nation. It is worth remembering that it was not always thus.
The act of a man giving the nation a vast fortune because he felt America
was the place from which to "increase and diffuse knowledge among men" is a
good place to start. To reflect on Smithson and his bequest is to remind
ourselves of the facet of our nation that was and is still good, a beacon in
the imagination of people living in darker times and places.

US WEEKLY October 15,
2001
Life for
Laura Bush
As she settles into her latest role as comforter-in-chief, the
president’s wife recalls how she heard the news and describes how her life
has changed
FOR FIRST LADY LAURA
BUSH, THE MORNING OF SEPTEMBER 11 STARTED OUT JUST LIKE ANY other day at the
White House. She got up early. There were her two dogs, Barney, a frisky
black terrier, and Spot, an English springer spaniel, to walk, meetings to
attend and senators to see. The president was out the big doors first,
catching Air Force One for a day trip to an elementary school in Florida.
Soon after, the in-laws, former President George Bush and former First Lady
Barbara Bush, who had spent Monday night at the White House, hopped a
private jet to Minnesota for a political speech.
The first lady was the last
Bush to exit the White House on that sparkly late-summer morning. Just
before 9 A.M., she was heading off to Capitol Hill, scheduled to be only the
fourth first lady to testify before a congressional committee. Her mind was
focused on the speech she was to deliver about early childhood education.
As she stepped into a waiting car, her Secret Service agent informed her
that a plane had just crashed into one of the World Trade Center towers.
“Of course, at that time we thought it was just some weird freak accident,”
she recalls.
She didn’t think terrorism
until she got to the Hill. “That’s when we learned that a second plane had
hit,” she says. “Senator [Edward M.] Kennedy met me at the door. We both
agreed then that we would postpone the hearing. I went in and stayed in his
office for a while. Senator Judd Gregg joined us.”
While her agents and senior
staff frantically worked their earpieces and cellphones to get a handle on
the unfolding attacks, Laura Bush did little but sit stunned, watching the
tragedy unfold on a small television in the inner sanctum of one of the
GOP’s arch-foes.
THE WORLD HAS CHANGED OVER
THE LAST TWO WEEKS, AND LAURA BUSH HAS CHANGED with it. The former librarian from Midland, Texas, has transformed her
image from the behind-the-scenes presidential wife most comparable to Mamie
Eisenhower to the nation’s comforter-in-chief. In numerous public
appearances, she has managed to express grief with dignity and convey an
impression of resilience at the same time. Last week, before a meeting with
the queen of Jordan to bolster Arab-American relations, Bush sat down in the
White House Map Room and talked to US weekly about her new role and the
altered world in which we live.
Wearing a pair of slim
black slacks, a black sweater and a loose-fitting hunter-green knit jacket,
Bush, 54, looks more petite and delicate in person than she seems in
pictures. She has a small of aquamarine studs in her ears. Her fingernails
are unpolished. There’s a gold wedding band and an oval diamond on her ring
finger. The diamond is relatively new – a present to her from the president
last Christmas. Previously in their 23 years of marriage, she wore only the
gold band. “Bushy,” as she calls her husband, never had the time, she has
said, to buy her a proper engagement ring.
Bush recalls the minutes in
Kennedy’s office on the morning of September 11 as being a blur. “The TV
was on, but we weren’t watching every minute of it,” she says. “I mean, we
knew what was happening because people kept coming in, but we weren’t
watching the call she most wanted: “The president phoned as soon as he knew
that it wasn’t just an accident and probably as soon as he could find me,”
she says. “We said the same thing to each other: ‘How horrible. How
terrible. I’m OK. Somewhere safe. The girls are safe’ ”
Next, she made calls to
each of her 19-year-old twin daughters. Barbara, at Yale, first heard the
news on her clock radio, when the alarm woke her up. Jenna, at the
University of Texas and in a different time zone, was still sleeping when
the attacks occurred and was awakened with the news by a Secret Service
agent. The girls were quickly moved to secure locations in their separate
cities. Both girls, according to the president were “freaked.” Bush did
her best to reassure them. “I talked to them to make sure they were fine
and to tell them I was fine,” she says. Then she dialed a number in Midland
that she knows by heart, to get some comfort for herself. “I called my
mother to tell her I was fine,” she says. “But the fact is, I was calling
her to hear her voice to be reassured myself.”
From that point on, Bush
spent the afternoon like most other Americans, glued to the television.
“Horror,” she recalls slowly, trying to describe her feelings.
“Unbelievable sadness as we watched those buildings fall, and you know, you
knew what happened to all those people inside. Everyone had anxiety and
uncertainty, not knowing if this would happen all over the country.”
The first lady was perhaps
more at ease than the average American because her agents were receiving
news before it was reported on television. “I guess we weren’t that worried
that something would happen in Houston or L.A.,” she recalls. “Certainly,
in that first part of the day, we didn’t know. Then, after some time, we
started hearing from our agents that most of the planes had been accounted
for, fairly early in the day, I think, before they really started announcing
it on television. So at some point we started feeling reassured that it
wasn’t going to happen again that day.”
At around 4 P.M., her
security detail decided it was safe to take Bush back to the White House.
She finally saw her husband late in the afternoon, in a secure room with
Vice-President Dick Cheney and his wife, Lynne Cheney. The reunion with
“Bushy” was not private. “I know the Cheneys were in the room. It didn’t
seem like we were the only ones there,” she says. “We hugged, of course.
We were really glad to see each other, but also the enormity of what had
happened in our country had really sunk in by then, and so we just comforted
each other.”
Later that evening,
they tried to contact George H. W. Bush and Barbara Bush. They knew that
George W.’s parents had been diverted from their course to Minnesota, but
like many other Americans, the president could not reach his own parents,
because, Bush says, he had only a cellphone number for his father, and the
wireless system was overloaded.
The following
morning, the first lady started hearing from her girlfriends in Texas. She
communicates only via telephone or fax, not e-mail. Because her friends
thought she was too busy to talk on the phone, they faxed messages of
concern and prayer to her in the private residence.
THE FIRST LADY IS
RESERVED ABOUT THE DETAILS OF HOW SHE AND THE PRESIDENT ARE dealing with the
crisis in private. She says she wants to preserve a sense of continuity
within the household and project the same to the country. By most accounts,
she seems to be succeeding. During his recent New York visit, the president
alluded to his wife’s determination when he answered a question from a World
Trade Center rescue worker about his family. “Freaked out, the girls are,”
he replied. “Wife’s OK. She understands we’re at war – got a war
mentality.”
As to whether the private
conversations between the president and his wife have changed, Bush says
that she and her husband are discussing national security more than they
used to. “We talk about it like everyone else in America. We are all
involved in that sort of discussion, more than we were before,” she says.
“But in general, we are like every other married couple. We talk about what
we’re going to do on the weekend, what our plans are for the evening and
what our kids are doing.”
Bush admits to feeling some
degree of maternal anxiety over the fact that her children are so far from
home. “It’s hard. It’s very hard,” she says. “I haven’t seen them. But
like every other family, we are talking to them more now. And it’s not just
us calling them, they are calling in more now.” She says there really
hasn’t been a marked “before” and “after” transformation in the domestic
White House routine. Getting back to daily activities, the Bushes went out
last week with two friends to a suburban Washington, D.C., Tex-Mex
restaurant, where the president indulged his taste for enchiladas and
nonalcoholic beer. “We continue to have a very normal life here,” she
says. “We want to encourage Americans to go about their lives in a normal
way. But I do think everyone’s lives changed in the sense that we became
very aware of what really does matter. And the first people we called are
the people that really matter.”
Since the strikes, the
White House cabinet has come together more frequently and in more intimate
settings. The weekend after, for example, a war cabinet met at Camp David.
At the end of a day of somber brainstorming, the group came together around
the piano in the living room. Attorney General John Ashcroft played, and
National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, a concert pianist herself, sang
hymns and patriotic American songs. The first lady says the music soothed
the stressed-out crew. “It was really comforting and relaxing to listen to
them,” she says. “And I know it was really comforting for them because
music is an important part of both their lives.”
The first lady says she has
grown closer to Rice, Secretary of State Colin Powell’s wife, Alma, and
Lynne Cheney. Rice, because of her position, had often accompanied the
Bushes to Camp David on weekends before September 11, and she has been a
ubiquitous presence around the president since. “I love Condoleezza Rice!”
the first lady says. “I see her more than any other cabinet member. I
really love to be with her. One of the great things for me about the job
she has is that I’ve had a chance to get to know her.”
LAURA BUSH HAS BECOME A
NATIONAL SYMBOL OF RESILIENCE, AND SHE HAS stepped into her new role
without hesitation. She was the steadying hand behind her husband when he
visited burn victims from the Pentagon. She also served as the official
mourner at a variety of memorials. At the service commemorating the
hijacked jet that crashed in a Pennsylvania field, she recited lines from
poet Kahlil Gibran, in reference to the final cellphone calls of the
passengers who ultimately overwhelmed their hijackers and forced the plane
into the ground instead of a target. “Love knows not its own depths until
the hour of parting,” she read. In the Pennsylvania field, Bush also urged
mourners to remember the last goodbye of one passenger, who told his family
that he would see them again.
Two days after the
terrorist attacks, a very calm Laura Bush appeared on the morning TV shows.
Smiling reassuringly and speaking in an even tone, she urged Americans to
try to help their children feel safe again. “They need their parents to
give them a lot of hugs,” the first lady said.
A week after the attacks,
she traveled to Chicago to appear on Oprah Winfrey’s talk show. The two
women held hands through most of the broadcast. Bush again urged parents to
talk to and listen to their children. “It’s very reassuring for children to
hear their parents’ voices,” she said. “Of course, we can’t explain
terrorism, you know, we really can’t,” she added. “It’s just a horrible,
evil thing.”
Bush’s tight circle of
Texas girlfriends has often described her as a woman who doesn’t like to
dwell on difficulties. Her behavior since the attacks has proved to be
true. She has tried to address the national grief and fear without losing
sight of her primary focus, which remains promoting education.
She told US Weekly that she
was personally most moved by the stories she heard from the teachers of P.S.
234, the New York primary school that’s closest to Ground Zero. ”The
courage those teachers showed, and the impact [the attack] had on them . .
..” She pauses. “They are still dealing with what happened, and not only
are they dealing with themselves but also with the children in their schools
who they are comforting. I think we have to ask ourselves, Who is
comforting our teachers? Who helps them as they go back to school, and who
helps them deal with their own uncertainty? We need to be the ones who
comfort teachers.
“If there is some good that
comes out of this – and I really hope and pray that there will be – it is
that people will focus on what’s really important,” she continues. “I think
more people will look for jobs that they find fulfilling.”
For her own piece of mind,
Bush says, she reads. “I immediately turned to books,” she says. “I love
mysteries. I have ever since I started reading Nancy Drew years ago. They
have always been a great diversion to me.” The weekend before the terrorist
attacks, she had hosted the National Book Festival in Washington, D.C.
Mystery author Sue Grafton gave the first lady her latest novel, P is for
Peril, which Bush plowed through in the days and nights after September 11.
“I read [Grafton’s] book very quickly, and I gave it to Alma Powell that
first weekend [at Camp David when] we were all together.” Her staff has to
fetch a bag of safety pins to help make her loose jacket fit a bit better.
She leans stiffly against a plastic chair and poses for the camera with the
expression of one who has done the same thing many times and is neither
nervous nor terribly comfortable. After 10 minutes of flashing bulbs, she
asks whether she might not look better sitting down in an overstuffed chair
nearby. When no one agrees, she continues to lean on the hard plastic,
smiling gamely.
The first lady says that the
attacks have transformed a key aspect of what most Americans, and perhaps
the rest of the world, have come to regard as the hallmark of American
popular culture: celebrity worship. “Now the heroes are the celebrities ―
the firefighters, the teachers, the people who sacrificed their lives to
save other people,” she says. “The ordinary people who do extraordinary
things. All the people who gave blood, who made cookies for the firemen,
who wrote letters – that is where we see the true character of our country.”
She left the East Garden in a
hurry, removing safety pins herself while she walked. In another wing of
the White House, the queen of Jordan was waiting to meet her.


MIRABELLA March 1999
The liar’s
club
Like a certain President of the United States, Dr. Barbara Battalino
was caught lying about sex in a civil case. Unlike Bill Clinton, she lost
her job immediately, served time for perjury, and became a darling of the
right wing.
To find a perjury case
like the President’s, the seeker must dive into a rabbit hole where the
characters are fun-house-mirror versions of the ones we have come to know
and love. Down this hole, just as in Washington, logic and reason are bent
by lies, bureaucratic jargon, and possibly, personality disorders.
Conservatives –eager to
prove that average citizens get punished for exactly the kind of behavior
the President had gotten away with for nearly a year –ventured into this
Wonderland and unearthed President Clinton’s legal double.
Her name is Barbara
Battalino. An osteopath and a former Veterans Administration psychiatrist,
she stands just under five feet tall and speaks with a New Jersey accent
softened by a decade in the West. Married three times (her first marriage
ended in annulment, the second in divorce, the third when her husband died
of a heart attack two months after their wedding) and childless, she has the
avid friendliness of someone who’s lived too long in isolation. Last April,
she pleaded guilty to obstruction of justice for lying to a federal
magistrate about oral sex she gave a patient in 1991 in her office at the
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Boise, Idaho. Sentenced to
six months of home detention ending in February, she is required to wear an
electronic monitoring bracelet around her left ankle; when she ventures as
far as the edge of her garden with her miniature terrier, Tippy, the monitor
sends an alarm to private security guards, who call to make sure she’s
staying put. Battalino hasn’t been idle during her house arrest, however;
she’s fielded several dozen radio interviews –most of them with ardent
impeachment supporters –and hosted television producers from two networks.
In a few short months, the psychiatrist has taken her place in the
Clinton-haters’ pantheon of Women Wronged.
Battalino’s Monica
Lewinsky is a burly Vietnam veteran who looks like a white-haired Fred
Flintstone. His name is Edward I. Arthur. The recipient of a Purple Heart
–he injured his foot and back during a helicopter crash –he lives on VA
disability payments near Columbus, Ohio. He’s sixty-three, twice divorced,
with four adult children. Seven years ago, Arthur filed suit against the VA
and Battalino, charging that the oral sex he had with her was an “assault”
and that, subsequently, the agency failed to adequately treat him. He now
says he relates to women who’ve been sexually harassed. “A lot of vets are
macho guys who ask me why I didn’t just lie back and enjoy it.” He shakes
his head in disgust. “Now I know where all those women are coming from.
Nobody cares about the victims!”
As with Monica and Bill,
Barbara and Arthur say their feelings have changed dramatically since they
first had sex on a summer afternoon in 1991 – and began an affair that lasted
through the year. During those months, Arthur admits he enjoyed Battalino’s
attentions. But he now calls the diminutive doctor a “calculating,
vindictive person”; Battalino labels her former lover a “sociopath.”
Also as with the
President and his paramour, there were gifts –Arthur got the doctor’s cobalt
blue Porsche, the use of her house, and the promise of $100,000 a year if he
moved to California with her. And there were many hours –twenty-five, to be
exact –of incriminating, surreptitiously recorded phone conversations.
Battalino’s biggest
defender and very own conspiracy theorist (a la Hillary?) is her mother,
“Big Barbara” Battalino, as she calls herself. Big Barbara, eighty-four
towers over her fifty-three-year-old namesake, who’s serving her time in her
mother’s San Luis Obispo, California, home. The elder Battalino sees a vast
left wing plot in the fact that her daughter lost her career for lying about
sex, while Bill Clinton (probably) gets to stay in the White House.
Big Barbara is the
superego to her daughter’s id. When her mother enters the room, Little
Barbara gets quiet and switches from the personal to the political. With
pale-green cat eyes, Big Barbara watches as her daughter is interviewed,
frequently interjecting her own political opinions, “The issue here is not
sex, the real issue is lying,” Little Barbara says.
”Yeah―truth or
consequences!” Big Barbara bursts in.
Finally, Battalino’s Ken
Starr is another disabled Vietnam veteran and a former Boise VA hospital
social worker: Henry Parker. Parker, who suffered leg and back injuries in
Vietnam and also has a history of psychological problems, says he was so
incensed by what he believes was the VA’s whitewashing of Battalino’s
ethical breach (and by other sexual shenanigans he alleges occurred among
hospital staff) that he tried to commit suicide, twice. But he recovered
from his self-inflicted wounds―an overdose of tranquilizers and a hanging―to
ultimately bring Battalino’s lie to the attention of the world.
These days, Parker, a
slight, impeccably dressed graying blond who retains a trace of his native
Alabama accent, sits in his Boise townhouse with a black kitten named JuFu
and notebooks full of court papers and obscure VA documents, eager to tell
anyone who will listen the long, complicated saga of his downfall. “I found
out you better have everything in writing and on tape,” he says, admitting
that he once hired a private detective to spy on a former colleague. “And I
found out that even if you do that, they will still nail you.”
For Barbara Battalino,
it wasn’t supposed to end with national notoriety over a blow job. Raised
in North Bergen, New Jersey, the granddaughter of Italian immigrants, she
was “always a good girl,” her mother says. The Battalinos were devoted
Catholics, and Barbara even spent ten months in a convent after college.
She changed course after her father, an osteopath and the local police
surgeon, decided his daughter would have a more promising career following
in his footsteps. So Battalino went to the Philadelphia College of
Osteopathic Medicine and later did residencies in psychiatry at several
hospitals.
A few years after her
dad died in 1981, Barbara, then in her early forties and between marriages,
and her mother and younger brother (also an osteopath) moved to California.
Her brother joined the state prison system and she followed, landing a job
counseling inmates. Both Barbaras had been Democrats while Mr. Battalino
was alive, but they changed parties once they moved to the coast. Her
mother was always a Republican “philosophically,” Battalino says, but
registered as a Democrat for her husband’s sake. She calls her own switch
of allegiances a “matter of maturity.”
In 1990, Little Barbara
decided she wanted a change of scenery and moved to Boise to take a job at
the VA hospital. Through the looking glass, the hospital campus, nestled on
a ridge below the picturesque mountains surrounding Boise, might be
considered a perfect setting for romance, with its gnarled old trees,
gazebo, old officers’ quarters―and legions of lonely men. It was there, in
Battalino’s office in the oldest Federal-style building west of the
Mississippi, that the nation’s second most litigated act of oral sex
occurred.
Now, sitting in her
mother’s ranch-style house festooned with Catholic icons and Christmas
decorations, Battalino tells how she first met Ed Arthur, who at the time
was being treated by the hospital’s post-traumatic stress disorder team and
had been seeing VA therapists for at least two decades. Concerned about the
side effects of antianxiety medication prescribed by other VA doctors,
Arthur consulted with Battalino in her office three times, but she says
their ensuing affair wasn’t improper because she wasn’t officially his
psychiatrist (he was an outpatient; she treated inpatients), and he
initiated the meetings.
The American Psychiatric
Association’s ethics code states, however, that because of the inherent
imbalance of power between therapists and patients (current or former), sex
between them is always unethical, whoever starts the relationship. And for
Battalino to say that Arthur wasn’t her patient is an outright lie, contends
her former boss at the VA, chief of psychiatry Larry Dewey, M.D. In his
office, circled with chairs for group-therapy sessions, Dewey recalls
Battalino’s “intransigence” when he confronted her about Arthur. “She
couldn’t see anything wrong with what she was doing with Mr. Arthur. It’s
ridiculous. She charted on him, she prescribed medications, she did
everything you do as a treating psychiatrist. She continues to lie about
it, and it outrages me to hear her lying again,” says Dewey, who asked
Battalino to leave after he discovered the affair.
In any event,
Battalino’s visits with Arthur quickly became more than clinical for her.
“He was a good-looking man; he’s put on weight since then,” she says.
Indeed, Ed Arthur was once a lean, slit-eyed soldier―although that was
likely long before Battalino laid eyes on him―and he has a vast collection
of pictures of himself to prove it. Some of them appear in Headhunters, a
book about Vietnam that Battalino borrowed from her VA colleague Parker soon
after she met the man who would become her lover.
Whatever the initial
spark, Battalino says she “had feelings” for Arthur after his third visit
and believed they were reciprocated. “Each visit, he was more dressed up,
heavy cologne, very engaging, telling jokes,” Battalino recalls. “I was
aware this man was coming on to me. He was attractive. He had no kind of
psychotic disorder―this idea that he was a poor sick veteran is a distortion
of fact. So after that third visit I was going to tell him to go back to
his regular team, and I was not going to continue to see him on VA
premises.”
There is no longer any
debate about what happened in her office on Arthur’s fourth visit. There is
only disagreement about who made the first move (though that, too is
irrelevant, according to APA ethics). “My sole intention was to tell him to
go back to his PTSD team,” Battalino says. “When I said that, he at first
said, “Is there no discussion?” I said, ‘This is the way it’s got to be.’
He asked if I would agree to see him on a social basis, and I said, ‘You and
I are single. I see no problem with that.’ He asked me for my home phone
number. I wrote it on a piece of paper, turned around to hand it to him,
and that’s when he held me close. I started to push him away. He said,
‘Will you please have oral sex with me?’”
That led to a six-month
affair, and, eventually, after Arthur refused Battalino’s offer of $100,000
to follow her to California―”That’s prostitution! I’m not a male whore!”
Arthur indignantly recalls―he began taping their conversations. His lawyers
urged him to do it, Arthur says, but he was hardly reluctant about setting
the trap. He’d concluded that his lover was “too pushy” and wore too much
makeup; plus, he says, her “Brooklyn accent” had begun to get on his nerves.
Ed Arthur’s home in
icebound rural Ohio is crammed with military and police memorabilia.
Sitting on his couch smoking a cigar (“I don’t inhale,” he snorts) and
watching pro football on a large-screen television, Arthur wears a blue
shirt emblazoned with “POLICE.” A bulletproof vest lies within easy
reach. Although he’s a volunteer with the local police department, he
concedes it’s rare that he actually needs the vest. His main duty, he says,
is to occasionally counsel juvenile delinquents. But he is a devoted police
buff that he jokingly answers the phone, “Homicide.”
Arthur says a VA
psychiatrist assigned him to Battalino. He initially resisted because he
didn’t think a woman could understand problems like his recurrent
nightmares. “What’s a female doctor going to know about combat?” he
recalls. “It’d be like me trying to understand the emotions of a woman
giving birth.”
Arthur was born in 1935
in Columbus, the son of a railroad worker. His mother abandoned the family
when he was a boy―an event he says prompted a lifelong distrust of women,
exacerbated by Battalino’s crossing the professional boundary with him. As
a child, Arthur repeatedly ran away from home, joining the Ohio National
Guard at thirteen. He was discharged after two years for being underage,
then enlisted in the Army. In the early 1960’s, he belonged to a CIA-funded
unit called Commandos L that helped arm anti-Castro Cubans trying to
overthrow the government. According to articles published in the Miami
papers at the time, Arthur tooled around the waters of the Florida Bay in a
small, armed motorboat painted with “PT-109.” In Vietnam, he served with
the Army’s 1st Cavalry Division and says he killed sixty-six Vietcong close
range. After he came home in 1970, he was so disturbed by all the killing
that, he says, “I couldn’t touch my wife for months.”
His civilian career
since then is a matter of dispute. He says that while receiving VA
disability payments he’s been involved with local law enforcement on a
volunteer or paid basis in Ohio, Colorado, and New Mexico. He proudly
points out one of the plaques on his wall: a “Lifetime Achievement Award”
granted to him by the American Police Hall of Fame in 1996. But the
executive director of that group says it was rescinded last year, due to
evidence brought out in court that Arthur had presented false documents to
qualify for the honor.
Arthur’s Army service
record is equally murky. At the trial, military-records experts testified
that the discharge documents he routinely showed to prospective employers
had been altered to increase his years of education and his Army exploits.
That revelation cost him his membership in the Ohio Military Reserve, a
state militia similar to the National Guard.
Not surprisingly,
Arthur’s recollection of the oral sex differs from Battalino’s. He agrees
only that she approached him in the hall and asked him to come to her
office. “When she said, ‘I’ve got to talk to you,’ she was real nervous,
and I deduced from that there was something wrong with me―something bad,
like cancer―and they were going to use my psychiatrist to lay it out for
me. I spent a couple hours walking around the campus with all kinds of
thoughts going through my mind. My main thought was my fifteen-year-old
son. I thought, Good God, I don’t want to die yet.
“So I go to her office
and sit down. Now, before this, she had been telling me the men at the VA
were all trying to kill me with these drugs; they were trying to keep me
doped up with Valium. She had me pretty well convinced. At this meeting
she said, ‘I have something to tell you; I have feelings for you.’ Then she
went over behind me, turned the lock in the door, came over to me, and the
rest is history. I just remember looking out the window, staring at this
tree . . ..”
Beyond the tree, just a
block away and visible from Battalino’s old office, is the white rectangle
of the Boise federal building, where Ed Arthur’s lawsuit eventually came to
trial. The affair had begun to unravel when Arthur revealed his
relationship with Battalino to his VA therapist, who in turn told Dewey.
After Battalino left the hospital, Arthur says he felt “dumped” by the VA,
even though his therapist asked him to resume therapist. He didn’t go back,
he says, because he worried hospital staffers would whisper and gossip about
him.
About a year later,
Arthur filed his suit. Battalino was dropped from the case in 1995 after
filing for bankruptcy, but Arthur continued pressing his claim against the
VA. Battalino’s lie had come early in the proceedings, when she denied any
in-office sex before a magistrate, but the contradiction between her
testimony and Arthur’s tapes wasn’t noticed by the Justice Department until
1997―thanks to the dedicated efforts of one Henry Parker.
Even before Battalino
and Arthur got together, Parker believed there was too much hanky-panky
going on at the VA, with what (he says) doctors having affairs with student
nurses and the director having an affair with his secretary. The former
director, James Goff, left in 1992 under a cloud, says Dewey, the chief of
psychiatry. Although the nature of Goff’s troubles was never made public by
the VA, his former secretary, Barbra Carlson, signed an affidavit describing
his insistence that she have sex with him on his office sofa. In an
interview, Carlson says she complained about her boss to VA higher-ups, but
to no avail; eventually, she says, she took a lower-paying job at another
agency to “get away from him.” Bruce Stewart, the associate director of the
Boise institution, says that he and the current director started after Goff
left, but they didn’t know of any formal or informal complaints against
him. Goff, now the director of the VA medical center in Palo Alto, did not
return calls requesting comment.
Parker’s first suicide
attempt came the day he lost an expected promotion ―the result, he says, of
his reporting a VA attorney whom he heard making salacious jokes about
Battalino and Arthur. That evening, he took an overdose of tranquilizers,
which sent him to an intensive-care unit for several weeks. (Dewey says
Parker himself chose to heave his job, due to his psychological
instability.) Since then, Parker has devoted his life to getting revenge on
the VA. He spent hours at the federal courthouse poring over the
transcripts of Arthur’s tapes and other documents. When he spotted the lie,
Parker alerted the local police, but they did nothing. Then, he says, he
contacted the FBI.
In the fall of 1997,
federal prosecutor Jonathan Mitchell flew to Boise to interview the
participants. “I recommended that Battalino be charged in November of 1997,
and I finished my prosecution memo in February 1998,” says Mitchell, who now
works at the state attorney general’s office in Boston. “In the meantime,
the world was introduced to Monica Lewinsky.”
Mitchell and his
colleagues at Justice were always aware of the parallels between Battalino’s
perjury and the President’s, he says. “But nobody thought much of it
because we just assumed there had been other cases like this, sexual
harassment cases in which someone lied and someone else had the goods―a tape
or dress―and a perjury prosecution followed.”
In April, Battalino
signed her plea agreement, and in July she was sentenced to house arrest.
Because she voluntarily resigned her medical licenses at the time, she can
appeal to get them back.
Finally, in September, a
month after Battalino began her detention, a federal judge in Boise ruled on
Arthur’s malpractice claim. The case was dismissed, in part because the
judge agreed with government psychiatric experts who said Arthur had a
personality disorder “manifested by embellishment and deceit,” and, thus,
his charges that the VA had harmed him were unreliable.
Arthur insists that
despite the public humiliation he’s endured, he made the right choice to
file suit. In his own eyes, he’s the classic American hero, the little guy
who nobly―albeit unsuccessfully―took on a behemoth and lost. “I knew other
people who were worse off than I was. What you have at the VA in Boise is a
clique of guys who all play golf together. That institution is their
playground. These cute little nurses come down from the University of
Washington, and they’re patting them on the butt! You don’t have the right
to use your position of authority to do things to people.”
Battalino might have
served out her sentence in obscurity―had the White House and its supporters
not begun proclaiming last spring that no one’s ever prosecuted by the
federal government for lying about sex. Steadfast Clinton loyalist Geraldo
Rivera even offered $10,000 to anyone who could find such a case, Jonathan
Mitchell recalls, though he didn’t take the bait. Instead, impeachment
commentators Joe diGenova and Victoria Toensing got the ten grand for
bringing Battalino to Geraldo’s attention. The winner should have been
David Tell, however; he wrote an editorial about Battalino’s case in the
conservative Weekly Standard on June 22. Tell refuses to name his source,
but, he adds, “This was not a feat of superhuman journalistic effort.” (In
fact, the Boise Weekly had beaten him to the punch months before.)
The next thing Battalino
knew, she got a call from the House Judiciary Committee offering her an
all-expenses-paid trip to Washington to testify at the impeachment
hearings. Sitting in a witness chair before the committee on December 1,
1998, Battalino told the world about the “one act of consensual oral sex:
she had lied about and concluded that without the Rule of Law, “atrocities
like slavery, genocide, potential nuclear and biological warfare, and
oppression are sure to surface their ugly heads again.”
Like Ed Arthur,
Battalino sees herself as a crusader for a previously ignored group of
victims―perjurers who decide to come clean―and believes she has found a
purpose in “this terrible nightmare.” The call to testify made her realize
she was part of God’s greater plan to bring Clinton to justice. “I believe
from the way things have evolved that divine providence, somehow or other,
was at work. I felt a moral responsibility when Mr. Hyde’s aide called me.
This is about much more than me now. There are double standards to be
addressed everywhere.”
Plucked from the rabbit
hole that is Weird America, her private peccadilloes now a matter of
congressional record, Barbara Battalino has joined that coterie of men and
women whose grubby secret lives have been hitched to the impeachment train.
She has hired a PR man to steer her through the publicity and has learned to
find comfort in the opportunity for mass confession provided by big media.
She even has fans. Thanks to her frequent radio interviews (the day before
we met she spent two hours on the phone with Ken Hamblin, a conservative
African American radio host in Denver who calls himself “The Black
Avenger”), Battalino has been contacted via phone and letter by scores of
people offering moral support.
It’s important to follow
the Commandments, not only because they’re in the Bible, but because it’s
part of a good citizen,” she says. “On one show a woman called and said her
youngsters are saying if they get away with something at school, they
‘pulled a Clinton’!”
Big Barbara huffs and
heaps more contumely on the President: “This guy is the most defiant idiot!
If he were my son, he’d have gotten a lot of kicks in the pants!”
Counting the days before
her release from home detention, Battalino is also planning to try to get
her professional license back. “I will eventually get on with my life,” she
says. “I can empathize with Clinton just wanting to get on with his job,
but nobody said to me I had two years left on my license, and that I could
finish them. If Mr. Clinton isn’t convicted, I will be requesting my
prosecution be reduced from a felony to a misdemeanor.”
Of course, there’s
always the literary route, if she fails to get reinstated as a
psychiatrist. She may soon be writing a book. “I think I should, because
it’s just so complicated,” she says. “And it doesn’t sound real.” |
|